Search for: "US v. Ferreira"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2009, 7:18 am
Fernando V. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:41 pm
US v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
Ferreira v Portugal App No 41696/07 (21/12/2010) [Link is to judgment in French, the only available version. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
Ferreira v Portugal App No 41696/07 (21/12/2010) [Link is to judgment in French, the only available version. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 10:13 pm
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:45 pm
In Ferreira v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
"A Quiet Change in US Policy Threatens Immigrants Who Apply for a Change in Status," QZ, 7 July 2018 [text]"Re-Victimization and the Asylum Process: Jimenez Ferreira v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
Os três policiais foram condenados, em julho de 2008, à pena de pena de 10 anos e meio de reclusão, pela prática de sequestro e cárcere privado (artigo 148 do Código Penal) em relação à vítima Renan Vieira Ferreira; e por extorsão mediante sequestro (artigo 159 do mesmo Código) contra Marco Antônio (Playboy). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 10:10 am
By Matheus V. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:02 am
" United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
James is a family medicine specialist whose patients used to include plaintiff Robert Buck. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 3:42 pm
Janus v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:09 am
The second one is a discussion of the case of Le Sueur v eThekwini Municipality by Warren Freedman, and the last one is a discussion of the case of Apollo Tyres v South Africa (Pty) Ltd v CCMA by Shamier Ebrahim. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:03 pm
Trata-se do fato de que após a realização do ato por meio da videoconferência, o magistrado da 4ª Vara Federal da Subseção Judiciária de Ribeirão Preto interrogou novamente o condenado e os corréus de forma presencial em audiência realizada no dia 30 de junho de 2008, “não havendo, a princípio, prejuízo para o paciente”. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:53 pm
Having the foundation of In re Ferreira torn out from under it and supplanted by the infinitely friendlier, though also unbinding, Palmer v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:04 am
Norwitz, Sabastian V. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:56 am
The case before us involves no statutory implied consent like that applied in Woolery, but it does involve a separate exception to the warrant requirement established in Ferreira, which allows an officer to conduct field sobriety tests on reasonable suspicion. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm
Zolg v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:32 pm
Ferreira, 2014 WL 7466508 (Mass. [read post]
